Tell Us About Your Case
Medical Malpractice Resources
Overview of Medical Malpractice
Types of Malpractice
Delayed Cancer Diagnosis
Duty of Care
Causation
Damages
Surgical Complications
Doctor/Patient Confidentiality
Hospital Cases
Informed Consent
Links and Resources
Submit Interrogatories

Tell A Friend

The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.

Articles

August 03, 2001 - House Passes Patientsí Bill With Compromise On HMO Liability

Yesterday the U.S. House passed a patients' rights bill that included a compromise between the White House and Rep. Charles Norwood, and some liability guidelines for Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs).

Karen Ignagni, the president of the American Association of Health Plans, said that although the bill "moves away from the reckless litigation binge that the Senate-approved bill would encourage," it still has some problems. "Provisions allowing new lawsuits even when health plans are upheld by independent-review panels violate common sense and need to be changed," she added.

The White House-Norwood compromise reflected the key principles Bush said any patients' rights bill would have to include for him to sign it into law. The House bill allowed patients to hold their health plans accountable when they have been injured by a wrongful denial or delay of medical care.

Cases against HMOs would be heard in state court, subject to the new federal law. Patients in all 50 states would have a federal right to sue their HMOs in state court. The scope of insurers' liability would be defined by federal law. Patients could still sue an HMO, even if an independent medical reviewer found no cause for the claim. However, In those cases, the patient would have a higher burden of proof.

Economic damages awards would be unlimited. Non-economic damages would be capped at $1.5 million. Punitive damages also would be capped at $1.5 million and would be available only when the designated decision-maker went against the independent medical reviewer's decision that the claim for benefits should be granted.

Opponents of the bill said the fight is not over, and only the venue is changing. The conference committee presents a different set of political and policy issues from the House, which in turn was different from the Senate.

If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of possible medical malpractice, call Friedman Trial Lawyers now at (800) 446-6482 or CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A SIMPLE CASE FORM. The initial consultation is free of charge, and if we agree to accept your case, we will work on a contingent fee basis, which means we get paid for our services only if there is a monetary award or recovery of funds. Donít delay! You may have a valid claim and be entitled to compensation for your injuries, but a lawsuit must be filed before the statute of limitations expires.

<< back

Disclaimer

The above is not legal advice. That can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiar with all the facts and circumstances of a particular, specific case and the relevant law. See Terms of Use.

The medical malpractice information offered by Miami, Florida medical malpractice lawyers and contained herein, regarding Miami, Florida medical malpractice statutes and Miami, Florida medical malpractice claimants' rights is general in scope. No medical malpractice Miami, Florida attorney client relationship with our Miami, Florida medical malpractice attorneys is hereby formed nor is the negligent death information herein intended as formal legal advice. Please contact a Miami, Florida personal injury medical malpractice lawyer regarding your specific inquiry.





Contact Us
Name:
Email Address:
Phone:
What happened?:
Your Injuries:
Who Was At Fault?:



pro-websolutions.com
LawyerEdge Legal Marketing